The Interior — ScienceGrades 9–10

Unit 21 · Earth and Space

A unit of the course: the story, then chapter by chapter — sections, numbered lessons, a source or the numbers to read, three checks each — a review per chapter, and the wrap-up at the end.

← Science, the whole course

Drawn scene: an observatory dome open to a starry sky with the Milky Way and a spiral galaxy, the Great Lakes outlined as a lit map on the ground
21Unit

Earth and Space

Earth and Space Science

Stand on the Chicago lakefront on a clear night. The water in front of you was carved by ice a kilometer thick that melted only a few thousand years ago. The rock beneath your feet was a tropical sea floor 400 million years ago, and it rides on a plate that is still moving. Overhead, the light from a faint smudge in the constellation Andromeda left its galaxy 2.5 million years ago. Every one of those facts was once unknown, and every one was worked out from evidence you can learn to read.

This unit follows that evidence outward and inward. First, the universe: how starlight reveals what stars are made of, how a blinking star fixed the distance to another galaxy, why the universe is expanding, and how radioactive atoms date the Earth. Then Earth's own systems: the moving plates, the heat inside, the cycles of rock, water and carbon, the feedbacks that link them, and the ice cores that record 800,000 years of climate. Finally, people: the resources we draw on, the hazards we live with, the ways we have changed Earth's systems, and the methods for weighing what to do about it.

By the end you should be able to explain how scientists know the age of the universe and the Earth, why Illinois has earthquakes but rarely big ones, what the Great Lakes owe to glaciers, why the Gulf of Mexico has a dead zone each summer, and how to judge a proposed solution by its costs, benefits and constraints. You will see how ideas were argued over, rejected, and finally accepted because the evidence left no other choice.

How we figured it out
1610

Galileo publishes his telescope observations of the moon's mountains and Jupiter's moons.

1687

Newton's law of gravity explains Kepler's rules for the planets' orbits.

1859

Kirchhoff and Bunsen read elements in spectral lines; Tyndall shows carbon dioxide absorbs heat.

1912

Leavitt reports the Cepheid period-brightness rule; Wegener proposes continental drift.

1929

Hubble shows that farther galaxies recede faster: the universe is expanding.

1935

After the Dust Bowl storms, Congress creates the Soil Conservation Service.

1936

Inge Lehmann uses earthquake waves to find Earth's solid inner core.

1956

Clair Patterson dates the Earth at about 4.55 billion years using meteorites.

1958

Charles Keeling begins the continuous record of carbon dioxide at Mauna Loa.

1963

Vine and Matthews find mirrored magnetic stripes: the sea floor is spreading.

1965

Penzias and Wilson report the cosmic microwave background, the Big Bang's afterglow.

1987

Nations sign the Montreal Protocol to phase out chemicals that destroy ozone.

Chapter

The Universe and Earth's Place in It

Space
Big questionHow can we know the age, size and history of a universe we can never visit?
The story

The Star That Changed the Map of Everything

One faint dot on a glass photographic plate pushed the edge of the known universe out by millions of light-years.

In October 1923, Edwin Hubble sat at the eyepiece of the largest telescope on Earth. The Hooker telescope on Mount Wilson, above Los Angeles, had a mirror 2.5 meters across. Hubble aimed it at a fuzzy smudge called the Andromeda nebula. He exposed a glass plate for most of a night. Astronomers had argued for years about what that smudge was. Some said it was a cloud of gas inside our own Milky Way. Others said it was a separate galaxy, an island of stars unimaginably far away.

On the plate, Hubble found a faint point of light that had not been there before. He marked it with an N, for nova, a star that flares up once. Then he checked older plates of the same spot. The star had not flared once. It brightened and dimmed again and again, on a steady rhythm of about a month. Hubble crossed out the N and wrote VAR! in red. This was a Cepheid variable, a kind of star whose rhythm reveals its true brightness.

A decade earlier, Henrietta Leavitt at Harvard had found the rule: the slower a Cepheid blinks, the brighter it truly is. Compare true brightness to how dim it looks, and you get its distance. Hubble did the arithmetic. His answer was about 900,000 light-years. That was far beyond any estimate of the Milky Way's size. Later measurements pushed the number to about 2.5 million light-years, but the conclusion held.

Andromeda was not a nebula. It was a galaxy, a whole other Milky Way. The universe was suddenly much bigger than anyone had known, and full of galaxies. Hubble had not guessed this. He had measured it, from one blinking star on a piece of glass. Within a few years he would use the same tools to show that those galaxies were rushing away from each other, and the universe itself was expanding.

Talk about itHubble first labeled the star wrong, then fixed it by checking old plates. Why does science depend on records that let someone check a claim later?
Section 1

Reading Light From Far Away

46.1

Barcodes in Starlight

Main ideaSpread starlight into a spectrum and its dark lines tell you which elements the star holds.

Hold a glass prism in sunlight and a rainbow spreads across the wall. Isaac Newton did this in the 1660s and showed that white light is a mix of every color. In 1814 a German lens maker, Joseph von Fraunhofer, looked closer. He built a tool that spread sunlight very wide and saw hundreds of thin dark lines cutting across the rainbow. They were always in the same places. No one knew what they meant.

The answer came in 1859. Gustav Kirchhoff and Robert Bunsen heated pure in a flame and passed the light through a prism. Each element glowed in its own set of bright lines, like a barcode. Sodium always made two yellow lines. Hydrogen made a red line, a blue-green line and more. When light from a hot source passed through cooler gas of that element, the gas soaked up those same colors, leaving dark at the same places.

That meant the dark lines in the sun’s were a list of ingredients. The sun’s outer gas was absorbing light at the barcode of hydrogen, sodium, iron and more. In 1868 astronomers found a yellow line in the sun that matched no known element. They named the unknown element helium, after the Greek word for sun. Helium was not found on Earth until 1895. A star 150 million kilometers away had shown chemists an element before they found it under their feet.

Every star we can see sends us this kind of message. A spectrum tells us what a star is made of, how hot it is, and, as you will see later, whether it is moving toward us or away. We cannot scoop up a piece of a star. We do not have to. The light already carries the evidence.

Words to know
spectrum
light spread out into its colors, from red to violet, so each wavelength can be seen separately
absorption line
a dark gap in a spectrum where a gas has soaked up one exact color of light
element
a pure substance made of one kind of atom, such as hydrogen or iron
Check yourself

1. What are the dark lines in the sun's spectrum?

2. Helium was named after the sun because:

3. A distant star shows the barcode of iron in its spectrum. What can you conclude?

46.2

Bigger Eyes on the Sky

Main ideaEach larger telescope gathered more light and revealed objects no one had seen, and each one changed what people believed about the sky.

In 1608 a Dutch spectacle maker asked for a patent on a tube with two lenses that made far things look near. Word spread fast. By late 1609 Galileo Galilei in Italy had built his own and pointed it up. He saw mountains and craters on the moon, which was supposed to be a perfect smooth sphere. He saw four small lights moving around Jupiter, night after night. Here were moons orbiting something other than Earth. Not everything circled us.

Galileo’s tube was a : a lens bends light to a focus. Big lenses sag under their own weight, so there is a limit. In 1668 Isaac Newton built a that uses a curved mirror instead. A mirror can be supported from behind, so it can be made huge. Almost every large telescope since has been a reflector.

Why does size matter? A telescope is a bucket for light. A mirror twice as wide has four times the area and catches four times the light. Faint, far things become visible. The 2.5-meter Hooker telescope of 1917 let Hubble find Cepheids in Andromeda. The 5-meter Hale telescope of 1948 reached much farther. Today mirrors on mountaintops are 8 to 10 meters across, and several 30-meter-class telescopes are being built.

The next step was to leave the air behind. Earth’s atmosphere blurs and blocks light, which is why stars twinkle. The Hubble Space Telescope, launched in 1990 with a 2.4-meter mirror, sees sharper than much bigger telescopes on the ground. The James Webb Space Telescope, launched in December 2021, has a 6.5-meter mirror and sees infrared light from the earliest galaxies. Chicago has its own piece of this history: the University of Chicago’s Yerkes Observatory in Wisconsin, opened in 1897, holds the largest refracting lens ever put to use, about 1 meter across.

Words to know
refracting telescope
a telescope that uses a lens to bend light to a focus
reflecting telescope
a telescope that uses a curved mirror to gather and focus light
light-gathering power
how much light a telescope collects, which grows with the area of its lens or mirror
Check yourself

1. Why are almost all large modern telescopes reflectors rather than refractors?

2. A telescope mirror is made three times wider. How does the light it gathers change?

3. Why can the 2.4-meter Hubble Space Telescope see finer detail than a 5-meter telescope on a mountain?

46.3

A Ruler Made of Blinking Stars

Main ideaCepheid variables blink on a rhythm tied to their true brightness, so comparing true to apparent brightness gives their distance.

How far away is a star? For the nearest ones there is a trick you can test with your own thumb. Hold your thumb out and close one eye, then the other. Your thumb seems to jump against the background. That jump is . Astronomers watch a nearby star from opposite sides of Earth’s orbit, six months apart, and measure its tiny jump against far stars. In 1838 Friedrich Bessel used this to get the first star distance. But beyond a few thousand light-years the jump is too small to measure.

For farther stars, astronomers needed a standard candle: an object whose true brightness they knew. Then the rule is simple. Light spreads out, so a lamp twice as far away looks one quarter as bright. Know the true brightness, measure how bright it looks, and the distance follows. The problem was finding a kind of star whose true brightness could be known.

Henrietta Leavitt found one. She worked at Harvard College Observatory measuring stars on photographic plates. She studied , stars that swell and shrink, brightening and dimming on a regular of days to weeks. She focused on Cepheids in the Small Magellanic Cloud, all about the same distance from us. In 1912 she reported a clear pattern: the longer the period, the brighter the star. A slow blinker is a bright star. A fast blinker is a dim one.

Time a Cepheid’s rhythm and you know its true . Compare that to its apparent brightness and you have its distance, even millions of light-years away. This is the tool Hubble used on Andromeda. It is still one rung on the ladder astronomers climb to measure the universe, checked against parallax at the bottom and against exploding stars at the top.

Words to know
parallax
the apparent shift of a nearby object against a far background when you look from two places
Cepheid variable
a star that brightens and dims on a regular cycle whose length reveals its true brightness
period
the time one full cycle takes, such as one brightening and dimming of a variable star
luminosity
the true total brightness of a star, how much light it actually gives off
Check yourself

1. Two Cepheids look equally bright in the sky. One blinks every 3 days, the other every 30 days. Which is farther away?

2. Why does parallax fail for very distant stars?

3. A lamp is moved from 10 meters to 20 meters away. How bright does it look now?

Section 2

How the Sun and Stars Work

46.4

The Sun's Furnace

Main ideaThe sun shines because hydrogen nuclei fuse into helium in its core, turning a little mass into a great deal of energy.

The sun has been shining for about 4.6 billion years. Nothing burning like wood or coal could last that long. In the 1800s scientists tried to explain the sun’s heat with slow shrinking under gravity, but that gave only tens of millions of years, far less than geologists needed for Earth’s rocks. The energy source had to be something new.

The answer is . In the sun’s the temperature is about 15 million degrees Celsius and the pressure is enormous. Atoms there are stripped into bare nuclei and electrons, a state called . Hydrogen nuclei slam together so hard that they stick. Through a series of steps, four hydrogen nuclei become one helium nucleus. The helium has slightly less mass than the four hydrogens, about 0.7 percent less. That missing mass becomes energy, following Einstein’s rule that energy equals mass times the speed of light squared.

A tiny bit of mass makes a huge amount of energy, because the speed of light is so large. The sun converts roughly 4 million tons of mass into energy every second. It has enough hydrogen to keep doing this for billions more years. The energy takes a very long time to work its way out through the dense inner layers. Then it crosses the 150 million kilometers to Earth in about 8 minutes as light.

Arthur Eddington suggested in 1920 that fusion powered the stars. Hans Bethe worked out the detailed steps in 1939. The evidence includes the sun’s spectrum, its mass and size, its steady output, and neutrinos, ghostly particles produced in the core that detectors deep underground now catch. The furnace idea explains the sun’s age, its energy and its makeup all at once.

Words to know
nuclear fusion
the joining of light atomic nuclei into a heavier nucleus, releasing energy
core
the hot, dense center of a star where fusion happens
plasma
gas so hot that its atoms have split into nuclei and free electrons
Check yourself

1. Where does the sun's energy come from?

2. Four hydrogen nuclei fuse into one helium nucleus. What happens to the total mass?

3. Why did the 1800s idea of the sun shrinking under gravity fail?

46.5

How a Star Lives and Dies

Main ideaA star's mass decides how fast it burns its fuel and whether it ends as a white dwarf or in a supernova.

Stars are born inside cold clouds of gas and dust when gravity pulls a clump together. The clump heats as it squeezes. When the core reaches about 10 million degrees, fusion begins and a star is born. For most of its life, a star fuses hydrogen into helium in its core. Astronomers call this stage the . The sun has been on the main sequence for about 4.6 billion years and has about 5 billion years to go.

Mass is destiny. A star with more mass has stronger gravity crushing its core, which makes fusion run hotter and faster. So big stars burn through fuel quickly and shine for only millions of years, while small stars sip fuel for hundreds of billions. It seems backward, but a campfire with a huge pile of wood can burn out sooner if it blazes hard enough.

When the core’s hydrogen runs out, the star changes. The core shrinks and heats, the outer layers swell, and the star becomes a , cooler but far larger. The sun’s giant stage will swallow Mercury and Venus. A sun-sized star then fuses helium into carbon, puffs off its outer layers as a glowing shell, and leaves behind a hot, dense the size of Earth that cools for ages.

A star more than about eight times the sun’s mass goes further. Its core fuses heavier and heavier elements up to iron. Iron gives back no energy when fused, so the core collapses in a fraction of a second. The outer layers rebound in a , an explosion that can outshine a whole galaxy for weeks. What remains is a neutron star or a black hole. Chinese astronomers recorded such an explosion in 1054; its remains, the Crab Nebula, are still expanding today.

Words to know
main sequence
the long, stable stage of a star's life when it fuses hydrogen in its core
red giant
a swollen, cooler star that forms after a star's core hydrogen runs out
white dwarf
the small, hot, dense leftover core of a sun-like star
supernova
the explosion of a massive star at the end of its life
Check yourself

1. Which statement about star mass is correct?

2. What will the sun become at the very end of its life?

3. Why does a massive star's core collapse once it makes iron?

46.6

Where Your Atoms Came From

Main ideaHydrogen and helium came from the early universe; nearly every heavier atom in your body was made inside stars.

Look at your hand. The carbon in your skin, the calcium in your bones and the iron in your blood are atoms with a history. Each one was made somewhere, and the evidence from spectra and from nuclear physics tells a consistent story. The early universe made only the lightest elements. Everything heavier was cooked in stars.

In its first few minutes the universe was hot and dense enough for fusion everywhere. It made hydrogen, helium and a trace of lithium, then cooled too much to go further. That is why the oldest stars we find are almost pure hydrogen and helium. It is also why those two elements still make up about 98 percent of ordinary matter today.

Stars are the factories for the rest. Through their lives they fuse hydrogen into helium, helium into carbon and oxygen, and in massive stars onward to silicon and iron. Elements heavier than iron, such as gold and uranium, need an even more violent setting: the flood of neutrons in a supernova or the collision of two neutron stars. In 2017 astronomers watched such a collision and saw the spectral signs of freshly made heavy elements in its glow.

Dying stars scatter their atoms back into space. New clouds form from the enriched gas, and new stars and planets form from those clouds. Our sun is at least a second-generation star, born from a cloud already seeded with the ashes of earlier ones. Every heavy atom on Earth spent time inside a star that died before the sun was born. Carl Sagan put it plainly: we are made of star stuff.

Words to know
neutron star
the crushed, city-sized remnant left by some supernovas, made mostly of neutrons
lithium
the third-lightest element, one of the few made in the early universe
second-generation star
a star formed from gas that earlier stars had already enriched with heavier elements
Check yourself

1. Which elements did the early universe make in its first few minutes?

2. Where is most of the iron in your blood thought to have been made?

3. Why do the oldest stars contain almost no heavy elements?

Section 3

An Expanding Universe

46.7

Stretched Light and Fleeing Galaxies

Main ideaGalaxies' spectra are shifted toward red, and the farther the galaxy, the bigger the shift: the universe is expanding.

Stand by a road as a car honks past. The horn sounds higher as the car approaches and lower as it pulls away. The sound waves are squeezed in front and stretched behind. This is the , and it works for light too. Light from a source moving away is stretched to longer, redder wavelengths. Light from a source moving toward you is squeezed toward blue.

The barcode lines in a spectrum make this measurable. Hydrogen’s lines are always in the same places in a lab. If a galaxy’s hydrogen lines all sit a little toward the red end, the galaxy is moving away. The size of the shift gives the speed. Astronomers call this . Starting in 1912, Vesto Slipher in Arizona measured spirals and found that almost all were redshifted, some racing away at over 1,000 kilometers per second.

Hubble combined Slipher’s speeds with his own Cepheid distances. In 1929 he reported a simple pattern: the farther a galaxy is, the faster it recedes. Twice the distance, twice the speed. This is now called Hubble's law. It is exactly what you would see if space itself were stretching, carrying galaxies apart like raisins in rising dough. From every raisin, the others move away, and the far ones fastest.

This was not what most scientists expected. Even Einstein had assumed a universe that stayed the same size. The data said otherwise. Run the expansion backward and everything was once packed together, hot and dense. Hubble’s plot of speed against distance was the first strong evidence for a beginning. Later astronomers named that beginning the Big Bang.

Words to know
Doppler effect
the change in wavelength of sound or light when the source moves toward or away from you
redshift
the stretching of a light source's spectral lines toward longer wavelengths because it is moving away
Hubble's law
the pattern that a galaxy's speed away from us grows in proportion to its distance
Check yourself

1. A galaxy's hydrogen lines appear shifted toward the red end of the spectrum. What does this mean?

2. According to Hubble's law, a galaxy twice as far away as another should:

3. Why did Hubble's finding point to a beginning of the universe?

46.8

The Glow Left Over

Main ideaA faint microwave glow from every direction is the cooled light of the hot early universe, predicted before it was found.

If the universe began hot and dense, the early glow should still be around. In 1948 physicists working with George Gamow predicted it. The early universe was a hot fog of plasma that light could not cross. About 380,000 years after the beginning, it cooled enough for atoms to form and the fog cleared. The light released then has been traveling ever since, stretched by expansion from a fierce orange glow to faint microwaves just a few degrees above absolute zero.

The prediction was mostly forgotten. Then in 1964 Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson at Bell Labs in New Jersey were testing a large horn-shaped radio antenna. They heard a steady hiss they could not remove. It came from every direction, day and night, all year. They cleaned out pigeon droppings and checked every wire. The hiss stayed. Physicists nearby recognized it: this was the leftover glow, now called the .

Its temperature is about 2.7 , meaning 2.7 degrees above . It fills the whole sky almost perfectly evenly. In the 1990s the COBE satellite measured its spectrum and found the exact shape expected from a hot, glowing body that had cooled by stretching. COBE and later satellites also mapped tiny ripples, differences of a few parts in 100,000. Those faint ripples were the seeds that gravity grew into galaxies.

The microwave background is the strongest evidence for the Big Bang. It was predicted in detail before anyone looked, then found by accident by people who were not looking for it. Its smoothness, its spectrum and its ripples all match what a hot early universe should leave behind. No rival idea has explained all three.

Words to know
cosmic microwave background
the faint microwave glow from all directions, the cooled light of the early universe
kelvin
a temperature scale that starts at absolute zero; 0 kelvin is minus 273 degrees Celsius
absolute zero
the coldest possible temperature, where particles have the least motion possible
Check yourself

1. What is the cosmic microwave background?

2. Why was finding the microwave background such strong evidence?

3. The tiny ripples in the microwave background are important because they:

46.9

How Old Is Everything

Main ideaIndependent evidence gives the universe an age of about 13.8 billion years and the sun and Earth about 4.6 billion.

Light takes time to travel. Sunlight is about 8 minutes old when it reaches you. Light from the Andromeda galaxy left it about 2.5 million years ago. A is the distance light travels in one year, roughly 9.5 trillion kilometers. So the farther out a telescope looks, the further back in time it sees. The James Webb telescope sees galaxies as they were more than 13 billion years ago.

Several lines of evidence agree on the universe’s age. The expansion rate from Hubble’s law, traced backward, gives a starting time. The ripples in the microwave background give an independent number. The oldest stars in our galaxy, dated by how they burn, are around 13 billion years old, and nothing found is older than the universe. All three point to about 13.8 billion years.

The Big Bang was not an explosion from a spot into empty space. Space itself has been stretching, everywhere at once. That is why every galaxy sees the others receding, with no center. Honest scientists also say what is not known. We do not know what, if anything, came before. We do not know why the expansion is speeding up, a discovery of 1998 that led to the name for whatever causes it.

Our own corner is much younger. The sun and the solar system formed about 4.6 billion years ago, when the universe was already two thirds of its present age. Earth’s oldest surviving rocks are about 4 billion years old, and tiny zircon crystals in Australia reach about 4.4 billion years. The universe had been making galaxies, stars and heavy elements for 9 billion years before there was an Earth to stand on.

Words to know
light-year
the distance light travels in one year, about 9.5 trillion kilometers
dark energy
the name for whatever is causing the expansion of the universe to speed up; its nature is unknown
zircon
a tough mineral crystal that can survive for billions of years and be dated by radioactive decay
Check yourself

1. Light from a galaxy 100 million light-years away shows the galaxy:

2. Which fact would contradict a 13.8-billion-year-old universe?

3. Why does every galaxy see all the others moving away from it?

Section 4

Our Solar System

46.10

A Cloud Becomes a Solar System

Main ideaThe sun and planets formed together from a collapsing, spinning cloud of gas and dust about 4.6 billion years ago.

Look at how tidy the solar system is. All eight planets orbit the sun in the same direction, in nearly the same flat plane, in nearly circular paths. The sun spins the same way. Any explanation of the solar system has to account for this order. A pile of captured wanderers would not line up like that.

The accepted explanation is the , first sketched by Immanuel Kant in 1755 and Pierre-Simon Laplace in 1796. A cloud of gas and dust, a , began to collapse under its own gravity, perhaps nudged by a nearby supernova. As it fell inward it spun faster, the way a skater spins faster pulling in her arms. Spinning flattened it into a disk with a fat, hot center. The center became the sun.

In the disk, dust grains stuck together into pebbles, then boulders, then bodies kilometers across. Gravity pulled these together in a process called . Close to the young sun it was too hot for ice, so only rock and metal collected: Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars. Farther out, past the frost line, ice was plentiful, and the cores that formed there grew large enough to pull in gas: Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. Leftovers became asteroids, comets and moons.

This is more than a story. Meteorites, the leftover crumbs, all date to about 4.56 billion years, giving the birthday. Since the 1990s telescopes have photographed flat disks around young stars, with dark gaps where planets are sweeping up material. In 2014 the ALMA radio telescope in Chile imaged the disk around the young star HL Tauri in stunning detail. We are watching other solar systems being born the way ours was.

Words to know
nebula
a cloud of gas and dust in space, the raw material for stars and planets
nebular hypothesis
the idea that the sun and planets formed from one collapsing, spinning cloud
accretion
the growth of a body as gravity pulls in and collects smaller pieces
Check yourself

1. Which observation is best explained by the planets forming from one spinning disk?

2. Why are the inner planets rocky and the outer planets gas giants?

3. What gives the solar system its age of about 4.6 billion years?

46.11

Kepler's Three Rules

Main ideaPlanets move on ellipses, speed up when nearer the sun, and take longer to orbit the farther out they are.

For two thousand years astronomers assumed planets moved in perfect circles. The idea was beautiful, and it was wrong. In the late 1500s the Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe measured planet positions with the best instruments before telescopes, night after night for decades. After Tycho died, Johannes Kepler took over his data on Mars. Kepler tried circle after circle. None fit. The errors were small, but Tycho’s measurements were better than the errors, and Kepler refused to ignore them.

In 1609 Kepler published his first two rules. First, each planet moves on an , a stretched circle, with the sun at one of its two focus points, not at the center. Second, a planet moves faster when it is closer to the sun and slower when it is farther away. Kepler stated this exactly: a line from the sun to the planet sweeps out equal areas in equal times. Earth is nearest the sun in early January and moves fastest then.

Ten years later he found the third rule, the one that links the planets to each other. The farther a planet is from the sun, the longer its year, and in a precise way. The square of the equals the cube of the average distance. Here distance is measured in Earth-sun units and time in Earth years. Mars is about 1.5 times as far as Earth, and its year is about 1.9 Earth years. Jupiter at about 5.2 units takes almost 12 years.

Kepler described the motion but could not say why it happened. Isaac Newton did, in 1687. His law of says every mass pulls every other mass, and the pull weakens with the square of the distance. From that one rule all three of Kepler’s laws follow. The same law that makes an apple fall keeps Jupiter on its ellipse, and it lets NASA steer a spacecraft to a landing on Mars.

Words to know
ellipse
a stretched circle with two focus points; planetary orbits have this shape
orbital period
the time a planet takes to go once around the sun
gravity
the attraction between all masses, which weakens with the square of the distance between them
Check yourself

1. Where is the sun in a planet's orbit?

2. When is a planet moving fastest along its orbit?

3. A newly found planet orbits its star at 4 times Earth's distance from the sun. About how long is its year?

46.12

Clocks in the Rocks

Main ideaRadioactive atoms decay at steady, known rates, so the ratio of parent to daughter atoms in a rock tells its age.

Some kinds of atoms are unstable. An atom of uranium-238, for example, will eventually break down through a chain of steps into lead-206. This is . You cannot predict when one atom will decay. But in a large group, the pattern is exact: after a fixed time, half of them will have decayed. That time is the . After two half-lives, a quarter remain; after three, an eighth. Nothing known, not heat, pressure or chemistry, changes the rate.

That steadiness makes decay a clock. When a mineral crystal forms from molten rock, it locks in certain parent atoms and starts with almost no daughter atoms. As time passes, parents turn into daughters. Measure the ratio of the two in the crystal, know the half-life, and you can calculate how long ago the crystal formed. Different work for different timescales. Uranium-238, with a half-life of 4.47 billion years, dates the oldest rocks. Carbon-14, with a half-life of 5,730 years, dates bones and wood up to about 50,000 years old.

In the 1950s Clair Patterson at Caltech set out to date the Earth using uranium and lead. Lead contamination was everywhere, from pipes, paint and leaded gasoline, so he built one of the first ultra-clean laboratories. In 1956 he reported an age of about 4.55 billion years from meteorites, which formed with Earth from the same disk. Later work on lunar samples and the oldest zircon crystals agreed. The number has barely changed in seventy years.

The method is checked in many ways. Different parent-daughter pairs in the same rock give the same age. Layers of volcanic ash dated by decay fall in the right order in the rock record. Tree rings and yearly lake layers confirm carbon-14 for recent times. When independent clocks agree, confidence is high. Radioactive dating is why we can say, and not just guess, that Earth is about 4.5 billion years old.

Words to know
radioactive decay
the breakdown of an unstable atomic nucleus into a different, more stable one, releasing radiation
half-life
the time it takes for half of a group of radioactive atoms to decay
isotope
a form of an element whose atoms have a different number of neutrons, such as carbon-12 and carbon-14
Check yourself

1. A rock contains one quarter of its original uranium-235. About how old is it?

2. Why did Patterson need an ultra-clean laboratory?

3. Which statement about half-lives is true?

Chapter review

The Universe and Earth's Place in It

0 / 8

1. What did Hubble's discovery of a Cepheid in Andromeda show?

2. Which tool lets astronomers know what a distant star is made of?

3. What is the sun's main energy source?

4. Why do galaxies show redshift?

5. Which piece of evidence for the Big Bang was predicted before it was found?

6. A star with 15 times the sun's mass will most likely:

7. Which observation supports the idea that the planets formed from one spinning disk?

8. A mineral holds one eighth of its original potassium-40. Its half-life is 1.25 billion years. How old is the mineral?

Chapter

Earth's Systems and Climate

Earth's Systems
Big questionHow do Earth's rock, water, air and living systems move energy and matter, and how do we know what they did in the past?
The story

The Continents That Fit Together

A weather scientist noticed that South America and Africa looked like torn pieces of one page, and spent his life being told he was wrong.

Alfred Wegener was a German meteorologist, a weather scientist, not a geologist. Around 1910 he was looking at a world map and saw what schoolchildren still notice: the east coast of South America and the west coast of Africa look like they would fit together. Others had noticed too. Wegener did something different. He went looking for evidence, and he found a great deal of it.

The fit was better than it looked. Match the continents along the edges of their underwater shelves, not the shorelines, and the fit is tight. Rock formations in Brazil lined up with formations in West Africa. Fossils of Mesosaurus, a small freshwater reptile, were found in both places and nowhere else; it could not have swum an ocean. A fern called Glossopteris left fossils in South America, Africa, India, Australia and Antarctica. Scratches left by ancient glaciers in India and Africa pointed the wrong way for those continents' present positions, but made sense if they had once been joined near the South Pole.

In 1912 Wegener proposed that the continents had once formed a single landmass, which he later called Pangaea, and had slowly drifted apart. He published a book in 1915 and kept adding evidence in new editions. Most geologists rejected it, some with scorn. The problem was a fair one: Wegener could not explain what force could push continents through solid ocean floor. His guesses about the mechanism were wrong, and critics used that to dismiss the whole idea.

Wegener did not live to see the argument settled. He died in 1930 on an expedition across the Greenland ice sheet. Through the 1950s and 1960s, new tools mapped the ocean floors and measured magnetism in seafloor rock. The ocean floor was spreading apart at long mountain ridges, carrying continents with it. The continents had moved, though not the way Wegener imagined. By 1970 the idea he had been mocked for was the foundation of geology, renamed plate tectonics.

Talk about itWegener had strong evidence that continents moved but no good explanation of how. Should scientists accept a pattern before they can explain it? What would you have wanted to see?
Section 1

A Surface in Motion

47.1

Evidence From Two Shores

Main ideaMatching coastlines, rocks, fossils and glacial scratches on separate continents are best explained by the continents once being joined.

Wegener’s case rested on several independent lines of evidence that all pointed the same way. That is the strongest kind of argument in science. Any one clue could have another explanation. Taken together, they fit only one story: the continents were once joined and have since moved apart.

Start with the rocks. Mountain belts in Scotland and Norway line up with the Appalachians of eastern North America when the Atlantic is closed. Ancient rock layers in Brazil match layers in West Africa in age and type. It is like tearing a newspaper and matching the lines of print across the tear. The , the shallow underwater edge of each continent, gives an even tighter fit than the coastline does.

Then the fossils. Mesosaurus was a small reptile that lived in fresh water about 280 million years ago. Its bones are found in southern Africa and in Brazil and nowhere else. The seed fern Glossopteris grew across all the southern continents, and its seeds were too heavy to blow across an ocean. Before drift, geologists explained this with imaginary land bridges that had since sunk. No trace of such bridges was ever found.

Finally the climate clues. Coal, which forms in warm swamps, lies under Antarctica. Scratches carved by glaciers about 300 million years ago mark rocks in India, southern Africa, Australia and South America, places now warm. Plot them on a map with the continents rejoined around the South Pole, and the scratches all point outward from one ice cap. On today’s map they make no sense at all.

Words to know
continental drift
Wegener's idea that the continents slowly move across Earth's surface
continental shelf
the shallow, gently sloping underwater edge of a continent
Pangaea
the single supercontinent that included all of today's continents about 250 million years ago
Check yourself

1. Why is the Mesosaurus fossil strong evidence for continental drift?

2. Ancient glacial scratches in India point in a direction that makes no sense today. What explains them?

3. Why does using several independent lines of evidence make a scientific case stronger?

47.2

The Ocean Floor Speaks

Main ideaNew crust forms at mid-ocean ridges and spreads outward, recorded in magnetic stripes and in seafloor that gets older away from the ridge.

For most of history no one knew what the ocean floor looked like. During and after World War II, ships with echo sounders traced its shape. Instead of a flat plain, they found a mountain chain running down the middle of the Atlantic and around the globe, 65,000 kilometers long, with a deep crack along its crest. This was the . It was volcanic, hot, and shaken by small earthquakes.

In 1962 Harry Hess proposed : molten rock rises at the ridge, hardens into new ocean crust, and the two sides move apart. Old crust sinks back into Earth at deep ocean trenches. A test came fast. Earth’s magnetic field flips direction every few hundred thousand years, and lava locks in the field’s direction as it cools. If Hess was right, the seafloor should carry stripes of normal and reversed magnetism, mirrored on both sides of the ridge.

In 1963 Frederick Vine and Drummond Matthews published exactly that pattern from ship surveys. The stripes were symmetric, like a tape recording played from the center out. Later, drill cores showed that seafloor rock gets older the farther it lies from the ridge. The oldest ocean floor anywhere is only about 180 million years old, while continents hold rocks 4 billion years old. Ocean floor is constantly made and destroyed.

Today the spreading is measured directly. Satellite positioning tracks stations on different continents and shows them moving a few centimeters a year, about as fast as fingernails grow. The Atlantic widens by roughly 2.5 centimeters each year. Wegener’s continents do move, but they ride on plates of crust and upper mantle, and the ocean floor moves with them.

Words to know
mid-ocean ridge
an underwater mountain chain where new ocean crust forms as plates move apart
seafloor spreading
the formation of new ocean floor at a ridge, pushing older floor away on both sides
magnetic reversal
a flip in the direction of Earth's magnetic field, which happens every few hundred thousand years
Check yourself

1. Where is the youngest ocean crust found?

2. Why is no ocean floor older than about 180 million years?

3. What made the magnetic stripe pattern a good test of seafloor spreading?

47.3

Where Plates Meet

Main ideaEarthquakes, volcanoes and mountains cluster along plate boundaries where plates spread apart, collide or slide past each other.

Earth’s outer shell is broken into about a dozen large and several small ones, each moving a few centimeters a year. Plot the world’s earthquakes on a map and they trace the plate edges in sharp lines. Volcanoes do too. The action is at the boundaries, and there are three kinds.

At a plates pull apart. Magma rises to fill the gap and hardens into new crust. The mid-ocean ridges are the main example, and Iceland sits right on one, which is why it has so many volcanoes. On land, East Africa is slowly splitting along a rift valley. At a plates push together. When ocean crust meets a continent, the denser ocean plate dives beneath in a process called subduction, melting and feeding volcanoes like those of the Cascades and the Andes. When two continents collide, neither sinks, and the crust crumples upward into mountains. The Himalayas are India still ramming into Asia.

At a plates slide past each other sideways. The San Andreas Fault in California is one. Rock on either side snags, strain builds for decades, then the fault slips in seconds. That sudden slip is an earthquake. The 1906 San Francisco earthquake moved the ground along the fault by several meters.

Illinois sits deep inside the North American plate, far from any edge, so big quakes are rare here. Not impossible, though. The New Madrid seismic zone in the Mississippi Valley near southern Illinois produced a series of powerful earthquakes in 1811 and 1812 that rang church bells hundreds of miles away. Geologists think an ancient, failed rift, a weak spot from long ago, is being squeezed by today’s plate motions. Small quakes still happen in southern Illinois every year.

Words to know
tectonic plate
one of the large rigid pieces of Earth's outer shell that move slowly over the mantle
divergent boundary
a place where two plates move apart and new crust forms
convergent boundary
a place where two plates push together, causing subduction or mountain building
transform boundary
a place where two plates slide past each other sideways
subduction
the sinking of a denser plate beneath another plate into the mantle
Check yourself

1. Which type of boundary creates new crust?

2. Why do the Himalayas keep growing?

3. Why are large earthquakes rare in Illinois?

Section 2

Inside the Earth

47.4

Layers Seen by Earthquake Waves

Main ideaSeismic waves bending and stopping inside Earth reveal a solid crust and mantle, a liquid outer core and a solid inner core.

The deepest hole ever drilled reaches about 12 kilometers. Earth’s center is 6,371 kilometers down. Nobody has seen the inside, yet we know its layers with confidence. The evidence comes from earthquakes. Each big quake sends through the whole planet, and instruments called seismographs on every continent record when they arrive. From the timing, scientists work out what the waves passed through.

Two kinds of waves matter most. P waves are push-pull waves like sound and travel through solids and liquids. S waves shake sideways and travel only through solids; a liquid cannot carry a sideways shake. In 1906 Richard Oldham noticed that S waves never arrived on the side of Earth opposite a quake. Something in the middle stopped them. In 1914 Beno Gutenberg pinned down its edge: a liquid core beginning about 2,900 kilometers down.

In 1936 the Danish seismologist Inge Lehmann studied faint P waves arriving where they should not have. She showed that inside the liquid outer sits a solid inner core. Above the core is the , about 2,900 kilometers of hot, dense rock. It is solid but can flow very slowly, like extremely stiff putty. On top is the thin . It is about 5 to 10 kilometers thick under oceans and around 35 kilometers under continents, thicker under mountains.

Other evidence backs up the picture. Earth’s overall density, about 5.5 times that of water, is much higher than surface rock, so the inside must be heavy: iron and nickel fit. Iron meteorites, the broken cores of shattered small planets, show what such a core would be like. And the swirling of liquid iron in the outer core generates Earth’s magnetic field, which is why the compass works and why the seafloor could record the field’s reversals.

Words to know
seismic wave
a vibration that travels through Earth from an earthquake or explosion
crust
Earth's thin, rocky outer layer, thinner under oceans than under continents
mantle
the thick layer of hot, slowly flowing solid rock between the crust and the core
core
Earth's iron-rich center, liquid on the outside and solid at the very middle
Check yourself

1. How did scientists learn that Earth's outer core is liquid?

2. What did Inge Lehmann discover in 1936?

3. Why must Earth's interior be made of something denser than surface rock?

47.5

Heat Moving Rock

Main ideaHeat from Earth's formation and from radioactive decay drives slow convection in the mantle, and that motion moves the plates.

Wegener’s critics asked the right question: what could possibly move a continent? The answer is heat. Earth’s interior is hot for two reasons. Some heat is left over from the planet’s violent birth, when colliding rock and sinking iron released huge energy. The rest comes from of uranium, thorium and potassium in the mantle and crust, which produces heat steadily and will for billions of years.

Heat inside must find a way out. In the mantle it does so by . Hot rock deep down is slightly less dense, so it rises very slowly; cooler rock near the top is denser and sinks. The same thing happens in a pot of thick soup on a stove, only the mantle moves centimeters per year instead of centimeters per second. Mantle rock is solid, but over millions of years it flows.

The plates ride on top of this and take part in it. At ridges, hot mantle wells up and new plate forms. As plate moves away from the ridge it cools, thickens and grows denser. Eventually its edge is dense enough to sink at a trench. The sinking slab pulls the rest of the plate behind it, a force geologists call , now thought to be the biggest single push on plate motion. Wegener was not wrong that continents move; he was wrong about why, and the why took another fifty years.

You can see the heat escaping. Volcanoes, hot springs and geysers at Yellowstone are mantle heat reaching the surface. The temperature in deep mines rises about 25 degrees Celsius for every kilometer down. Geothermal power plants in Iceland and California tap this heat directly, and heat pumps in Illinois homes use the steady temperature just a few meters underground.

Words to know
convection
the movement of heat by hot material rising and cool material sinking
radioactive decay
the breakdown of unstable atoms, which releases heat inside Earth
slab pull
the force of a cold, dense plate edge sinking into the mantle and dragging its plate along
Check yourself

1. What are the two main sources of Earth's internal heat?

2. In mantle convection, why does hot rock rise?

3. What is now thought to be the largest force moving plates?

47.6

The Rock Cycle at Scale

Main ideaPlate motion, heat, water and time move rock through igneous, sedimentary and metamorphic forms over and over.

Pick up a chunk of limestone from a quarry near Chicago and you are holding an old sea floor. Illinois was under a warm, shallow ocean about 300 to 450 million years ago. Shells and coral skeletons piled up, were buried and pressed, and became stone. The state’s coal formed later, from swamp forests buried in mud. Rocks are not permanent. They are stages in a cycle powered by heat inside Earth and by the sun and water outside it.

The cycle has three families. forms when melted rock cools, either underground into granite or on the surface into basalt and volcanic ash. forms when broken pieces, or minerals from water, settle in layers and cement together: sandstone, shale, limestone. forms when heat and pressure change an existing rock without melting it: limestone into marble, shale into slate.

Plate tectonics runs the deep parts of the cycle. Subduction carries sediment and ocean crust down to melt and return as volcanic rock. Colliding plates squeeze rock into mountains and cook it into metamorphic forms. Then the sun-driven part takes over. Rain, ice and wind break mountains into grains, rivers carry the grains to the sea, and layers build up again. Over hundreds of millions of years the same atoms may pass through all three families several times.

The record is not neat. A rock layer can be missing because it eroded before the next formed, and a gap in the layers is a gap in time. Even so, layers have an order, oldest at the bottom unless something has overturned them. Combine that order with radioactive dates from volcanic ash and you get a calendar of Earth’s history. Illinois’s own rocks, read this way, tell of seas, deltas, swamps and finally glaciers.

Words to know
igneous rock
rock formed when melted rock cools and hardens
sedimentary rock
rock formed from layers of settled particles or minerals that cement together
metamorphic rock
rock changed by heat and pressure without melting
erosion
the wearing away and carrying off of rock and soil by water, ice and wind
Check yourself

1. Limestone under Chicago is evidence that Illinois once:

2. Shale is buried deep and squeezed by colliding plates until it becomes slate. What kind of change is this?

3. What powers the surface half of the rock cycle, breaking mountains into sediment?

Section 3

Water, Air and Carbon

47.7

Water on the Move

Main ideaSolar energy lifts water from the oceans and gravity brings it back, moving heat and shaping land as it goes.

Almost all of Earth’s water, about 97 percent, is salty ocean. Of the fresh water that remains, most is locked in ice sheets and glaciers or stored underground. Lakes and rivers, the water we can see, are a tiny sliver. Yet the water cycle moves an enormous amount. The sun water from the oceans, winds carry the vapor, and it falls as rain and snow, some of it on land, where it runs back to the sea or soaks into the ground.

Water is a heat carrier. Turning liquid water into vapor takes a lot of energy, and that energy is released again when the vapor into cloud droplets. Warm tropical oceans load the air with vapor; when it condenses far away, it warms the air there. Much of the heat that moves from the equator toward the poles travels this way, as water vapor in the air and as warm currents in the sea. The Gulf Stream keeps northern Europe far milder than its latitude would suggest.

Water also works on rock. Rain slightly acidic with dissolved carbon dioxide slowly dissolves limestone, carving caves and sinkholes. Rivers carry sediment: the Mississippi hauls millions of tons of Illinois and Midwestern soil to the Gulf of Mexico every year, building the delta. Ice does more. Glaciers gouged the Great Lakes basins and left the flat, fertile plains of Illinois. Where water goes, the land changes.

Illinois sits beside one of the largest stores of fresh surface water on Earth. The five Great Lakes together hold about a fifth of the world’s liquid fresh surface water. Chicago drinks from Lake Michigan and, since 1900, sends its treated wastewater away from the lake by a reversed river. That decision, where each drop ends up, shapes politics, farming and city life across the whole region.

Words to know
evaporate
to change from liquid to vapor, which takes in energy
condense
to change from vapor to liquid, which gives off energy
watershed
the whole area of land that drains to one river, lake or sea
sediment
loose particles of rock, soil or shell carried and deposited by water, wind or ice
Check yourself

1. Where is most of Earth's fresh water?

2. How does water vapor carry heat from the tropics toward the poles?

3. What carved the basins of the Great Lakes?

47.8

Carbon and the Blanket of Air

Main ideaCarbon cycles among air, water, rock and life; the carbon dioxide in the air traps heat and keeps Earth warm enough for liquid water.

Earth without its atmosphere would average about 18 degrees Celsius below freezing. The actual average is about 15 degrees above. The difference comes from a few gases that let sunlight in but slow the escape of heat. This is the , and it is why the planet has liquid oceans. Water vapor is the largest part of it. and methane do the rest, and unlike water vapor they linger long enough to set the overall temperature.

The physics was measured, not guessed. In 1859 John Tyndall in London passed heat radiation through tubes of different gases. Nitrogen and oxygen let it through. Carbon dioxide, methane and water vapor absorbed it strongly. In 1896 Svante Arrhenius calculated by hand how much warmer Earth would get if the carbon dioxide in the air doubled. His answer was a few degrees, in the same range as modern estimates.

Carbon does not stay put. Plants pull carbon dioxide from the air to build leaves and wood; animals and decay return it. The oceans dissolve it and shells lock it into limestone. Volcanoes leak it back out over millions of years. This stayed roughly balanced for a long time, with carbon dioxide near 280 parts per million for thousands of years before the 1800s.

Fossil fuels are carbon that was buried for hundreds of millions of years. Burning coal, oil and gas returns it to the air in a few centuries. Direct measurements at Mauna Loa in Hawaii, begun in 1958, show carbon dioxide rising every year, past 420 parts per million by the early 2020s. The added carbon carries the chemical fingerprint of ancient plants, not volcanoes. The ocean, absorbing part of it, has become measurably more acidic. These are measurements, checked by many groups, not projections.

Words to know
greenhouse effect
the warming of a planet by gases that let sunlight in but slow the escape of heat
carbon dioxide
a gas of one carbon and two oxygen atoms, released by breathing, decay, volcanoes and burning
carbon cycle
the movement of carbon among air, oceans, rock and living things
parts per million
a way to state a small concentration; 400 ppm means 400 molecules out of every million
Check yourself

1. What did Tyndall's 1859 experiment show?

2. How do scientists know the added carbon dioxide comes from fossil fuels rather than volcanoes?

3. Without any greenhouse gases, Earth's average temperature would be:

47.9

Feedbacks Between Systems

Main ideaEarth's systems push back on each other; some feedbacks amplify a change and some dampen it.

Earth’s air, water, ice, rock and life are not separate. Change one and the others respond, and their response can make the first change bigger or smaller. Scientists call such a loop a . A microphone too near its speaker squeals: sound goes in, comes out louder, goes back in. That is a , which amplifies. A thermostat that shuts off the furnace when the room warms is a , which stabilizes.

Ice gives a clear positive feedback. Snow and sea ice are bright and reflect most sunlight back to space. Open water and bare ground are dark and absorb it. If warming melts some ice, more sunlight is absorbed, which warms things more, which melts more ice. The Arctic has warmed faster than the rest of the planet partly for this reason. The loop runs the other way too: growing ice cools, which grows more ice, one reason ice ages deepened once they began.

Water vapor is another amplifier. Warmer air holds more vapor, and vapor is itself a greenhouse gas, so a warming from any cause gets roughly doubled. On the dampening side, warmer air radiates more heat to space, which limits how far a warming can go. Over very long times, rock weathering acts as a thermostat: warmer, wetter climates dissolve rock faster, which pulls carbon dioxide out of the air and cools things back down. That takes hundreds of thousands of years, too slow to help on human timescales.

Life is in the loop as well. Forests take up carbon and release moisture that makes clouds. Ocean plankton produce gases that seed clouds. Thawing permafrost releases carbon that was frozen for thousands of years. Untangling which feedbacks dominate, and how fast, is a major part of climate science, and it is where much of the honest uncertainty in projections comes from.

Words to know
feedback
a loop in which the result of a change acts back on the cause
positive feedback
a loop that makes a change bigger, such as melting ice absorbing more sunlight
negative feedback
a loop that pushes back against a change and steadies the system
albedo
the fraction of sunlight a surface reflects; snow is high, open ocean is low
Check yourself

1. Which is an example of a positive feedback?

2. Why does rock weathering not prevent warming on human timescales?

3. Warmer air holds more water vapor, and water vapor traps heat. What kind of feedback is this?

Section 4

Reading the Climate Record

47.10

Bubbles in Ancient Ice

Main ideaIce cores hold layers of old snow and trapped air that record temperature and carbon dioxide for hundreds of thousands of years.

Snow that falls on Antarctica or Greenland does not melt. It piles up, year on year, and presses into ice. Each year’s layer traps tiny bubbles of that year’s air. Drill straight down and you pull up a column of frozen time. The deepest from Antarctica reach back about 800,000 years. Reading them is like reading tree rings, if each ring also held a sealed sample of the sky.

The bubbles give carbon dioxide and methane directly, by cracking the ice in a vacuum and measuring the gas. Temperature comes from the ice itself. Water molecules come in slightly heavier and lighter forms, and colder air leaves snow with fewer of the heavy ones. The ratio of heavy to light water in each layer is a for the temperature when it fell. Dust in the layers records droughts and wind; ash records volcanoes; sulfur spikes match known eruptions and help check the dates.

The cores show a rhythm. Over the past 800,000 years, ice ages and warm periods have alternated on roughly 100,000-year cycles, paced by slow wobbles in Earth’s orbit and tilt. Through all those cycles, carbon dioxide swung between about 180 parts per million in the coldest times and about 280 in the warmest. Temperature and carbon dioxide rise and fall together. Today’s level, above 420, is higher than anything in the entire record.

Ice is not the only archive. Ocean sediment cores, cave formations, coral bands, tree rings and lake mud each record different times and places. They are dated by counting layers and by radioactive decay, and where they overlap they agree. Any single record could be misread. It is the agreement among independent archives that gives confidence about past climate.

Words to know
ice core
a long cylinder of ice drilled from an ice sheet, holding layers of ancient snow and air
proxy
something measured in place of what you really want to know, such as heavy water as a stand-in for temperature
ice age
a long cold period when ice sheets spread over large parts of the continents
Check yourself

1. How do ice cores reveal the carbon dioxide of the past?

2. What does the ratio of heavy to light water in ice tell scientists?

3. How does today's carbon dioxide compare with the 800,000-year ice core record?

47.11

Models and Projections

Main ideaClimate models apply the laws of physics to the whole planet, are tested against the past, and give ranges rather than exact forecasts.

A is not a crystal ball. It is a large computer program that divides the atmosphere and ocean into millions of boxes and applies the same physics used for weather: how air moves, how water evaporates and condenses, how sunlight and heat radiation pass through gases. The first simple versions in the 1960s could be run on paper. Today’s versions run on supercomputers and include ice, vegetation and the carbon cycle.

The models are tested before they are trusted. Run one from 1900 with the known changes in sunlight, volcanoes and greenhouse gases and it should reproduce the warming that thermometers actually recorded. It does, and it fails to if greenhouse gases are left out. Models predicted in the 1980s that the lower atmosphere would warm while the upper atmosphere cooled, that nights would warm faster than days, and that the Arctic would warm fastest. All three later showed up in measurements.

A is not a . Models cannot know how much fuel people will burn in 2050, so scientists run them under several scenarios, from rapid cuts to continued growth. Each scenario gives a range, because the feedbacks, especially clouds, are not pinned down. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reviews thousands of studies. Its reports say Earth has already warmed about 1.1 degrees Celsius since the late 1800s. How much further it warms depends mostly on future emissions.

Honest science states its limits. Regional details, the timing of ice sheet changes, and the exact strength of cloud feedback carry real uncertainty. What is not uncertain is the direction: more greenhouse gas means a warmer planet, from physics measured in 1859. Models sharpen the picture; they did not create it. Students in Illinois can test the reasoning themselves by looking at how the state’s own growing season, frost dates and heavy rains have shifted over the past century.

Words to know
climate model
a computer program that applies physical laws to simulate the atmosphere, oceans, ice and land
projection
what a model shows would happen under a stated set of assumptions, such as a level of future emissions
prediction
a definite statement of what will happen; models give ranges, not single predictions
scenario
one possible future path of emissions or other choices used as input to a model
Check yourself

1. How is a climate model tested?

2. Why do models give a range of future temperatures rather than one number?

3. Which prediction made in the 1980s was later confirmed by measurements?

47.12

How the Great Lakes Were Made

Main ideaIce sheets a kilometer thick scraped out the Great Lakes basins and flattened Illinois, then melted back about 14,000 years ago.

Stand on the lakefront in Chicago and look north across water that stretches to the horizon. Lake Michigan is about 500 kilometers long and in places 280 meters deep. No river could dig that. The lakes are the work of ice. During the last , the Laurentide ice sheet spread from Canada across the northern United States. At its greatest extent, about 20,000 years ago, ice more than a kilometer thick covered most of Illinois.

A glacier is a slow bulldozer. Its weight and motion pluck rock from the ground and drag it along. The ice sheet followed old river valleys in soft rock and gouged them deeper and wider into the basins of the Great Lakes. When it reached harder rock, it scraped and polished it. The ground-up rock, from boulders to flour-fine clay, was carried south and dumped in a blanket geologists call . The flat, deep, fertile soil of central Illinois is mostly this till, topped by windblown dust from the dried-out glacial floodplains.

The ice began to melt back about 18,000 years ago. Where its edge paused, it left ridges of rubble called ; the low hills that curve around Chicago’s suburbs are moraines. Meltwater filled the basins in front of the retreating ice. An early, larger version of Lake Michigan, which geologists call Lake Chicago, stood higher than today’s lake and drained south through the Illinois River valley. Its old shorelines still show up as low ridges in the city. By about 14,000 years ago most of Illinois was ice-free, and the lakes have settled into their present shapes over the thousands of years since.

The evidence is everywhere once you know to look. Granite boulders lie in Illinois fields, hundreds of kilometers from any granite bedrock, carried down from Canada. Grooves scratched by rock in the ice mark exposed bedrock. Layers of till stack up from more than one glacial advance. The Great Lakes are young by Earth’s standards, a few thousand years old in their current form, and still slowly changing as the land, freed of the ice’s weight, rises a few millimeters a year.

Words to know
ice age
a long cold period when ice sheets cover large parts of the continents
glacial till
the unsorted mix of clay, sand, gravel and boulders dropped by a melting glacier
moraine
a ridge of rock and soil piled up at the edge of a glacier
ice sheet
a glacier large enough to cover a whole region or continent
Check yourself

1. Where did the granite boulders in Illinois farm fields come from?

2. What are the low hills curving around Chicago's suburbs?

3. Why is central Illinois so flat and fertile?

Chapter review

Earth's Systems and Climate

0 / 8

1. What problem kept most geologists from accepting Wegener's idea in the 1920s?

2. Which discovery in the 1960s confirmed that ocean floor spreads from the ridges?

3. Which observation shows Earth's outer core is liquid?

4. What drives the slow motion of the mantle?

5. A cave forms as slightly acidic rainwater dissolves rock. Which rock is it most likely dissolving?

6. Why do ice cores show carbon dioxide and temperature rising and falling together over the past 800,000 years?

7. What did John Tyndall measure in 1859?

8. Lake Chicago, the early form of Lake Michigan, drained to the south. What does that tell you?

Chapter

Human Sustainability

Earth and People
Big questionHow can people use Earth's resources and live with its hazards without using up what the next generation needs?
The story

The Day the Prairie Came to Washington

Farmers plowed up the grass that held the Great Plains together, and when the rain stopped, the soil itself took to the air.

For thousands of years a thick mat of grass roots held the soil of the southern Great Plains in place through droughts and wind. In the 1910s and 1920s, high wheat prices and new tractors changed that. Farmers in the panhandles of Oklahoma and Texas, and in Kansas, Colorado and New Mexico, tore up millions of acres of grassland and planted wheat. In wet years it paid. Then, starting in 1931, the rain stopped.

Wheat withered and the bare, powdery soil lay open to the wind. The storms began in 1932 and grew. On April 14, 1935, a day remembered as Black Sunday, a wall of dust more than a kilometer high rolled across the plains, turning afternoon to midnight. People lost their way a few meters from their doors. Dust drifted like snow against fences and buried farm machinery. Children and old people sickened with dust pneumonia. Hundreds of thousands of families packed up and left.

A year earlier, in May 1934, one storm had lifted dust so high that the wind carried it east across the whole country. It dimmed the sky over Chicago, then over Washington and New York, and settled on the decks of ships in the Atlantic. In Washington, a soil scientist named Hugh Hammond Bennett had been warning for years that the nation was throwing away its soil. Now the soil had come to the capital to make his argument for him. By many accounts he timed a Senate hearing in the spring of 1935 so that senators could look out the window at the haze while he spoke.

Congress passed the Soil Conservation Act in April 1935, and Bennett led the new Soil Conservation Service. Its agents taught farmers to plow along the contour of hills, to plant rows of trees as windbreaks, to rotate crops and to leave stubble on the field. The rains returned in 1939, and when drought came again in the 1950s, the land held far better. The Dust Bowl was not a natural disaster alone. It was drought plus decisions, and different decisions changed the outcome.

Talk about itThe farmers who plowed the plains were not foolish; wheat paid and the rain seemed reliable. What information, if they had it, might have changed their choices?
Section 1

Resources and Their Limits

48.1

Renewable or Not

Main ideaA resource is sustainable only if people use it no faster than nature replaces it; some resources are replaced in years, some never.

Everything people build, eat and burn comes from Earth. A is anything from the planet that people use: water, soil, wood, fish, coal, copper, sunlight. The useful question is not whether a resource is big but how fast it comes back. A is replaced by natural processes about as fast as it is used, like sunlight, wind, and a forest cut no faster than it regrows. A forms so slowly that for human purposes it is a fixed stock: oil, coal, natural gas, metal ores.

The line is not always sharp. Soil is renewable, but slowly: it can take centuries for natural processes to build a few centimeters of topsoil, and a single dust storm or hard rain can strip that away. Groundwater in some aquifers refills every year; in others it has been sitting since the ice age and refills so slowly it is effectively nonrenewable. A fishery is renewable until fishing outruns breeding, and then it collapses. Renewable means renewable at a rate.

Illinois sits on some of the largest coal deposits in the United States. Coal formed here from swamp forests about 300 million years ago and will not form again on any timescale that matters to people. It powered the state’s industry for over a century. Today most of Illinois’s coal-burning power plants have closed or are scheduled to, because natural gas, wind and nuclear power cost less and because of the pollution coal produces. The coal is still in the ground; the decision about whether to burn it is a human one.

means meeting today’s needs without wrecking the ability of the future to meet its own. The test is simple to state and hard to do. Use renewable resources no faster than they renew. Use nonrenewable ones while building replacements. Do not release waste faster than Earth’s systems can absorb it. Every lesson in this chapter is a case of that test being passed or failed.

Words to know
natural resource
anything from Earth that people use, such as water, soil, minerals or fuel
renewable resource
a resource replaced by natural processes about as fast as it is used
nonrenewable resource
a resource that forms so slowly it is a fixed supply for human purposes
sustainability
meeting present needs without destroying the ability of future people to meet theirs
Check yourself

1. Which best describes a renewable resource?

2. Why is topsoil treated as a nonrenewable resource by many farmers even though it does form naturally?

3. Illinois coal is still in the ground, but most coal power plants in the state are closing. What does this show?

48.2

Water Under the Prairie

Main ideaGroundwater is a shared, slowly refilled store; pumping faster than recharge draws it down for everyone.

Dig a well in central Illinois and you may reach water that fell as rain thousands of years ago. Beneath the soil lie layers of sand and gravel left by glaciers, and their pores are full of water. A layer that holds enough water to pump is an . The Mahomet Aquifer, buried in an ancient river valley across central Illinois, supplies drinking water to hundreds of thousands of people and irrigates farms. Wells share it; a pump in one town lowers the water in the next.

Water enters an aquifer by : rain and snowmelt soaking down through soil and rock, which can take years to decades. If people pump faster than recharge, the , the level below which the ground is saturated, drops. Wells go dry, shallowest first. Rivers and wetlands fed by groundwater shrink. In the High Plains west of Illinois, the Ogallala Aquifer has been pumped for irrigation for decades faster than it refills, and in parts of Kansas and Texas the water level has fallen tens of meters.

Chicago and its suburbs face the opposite geography: a vast lake next door. But use of Lake Michigan water is limited by a U.S. Supreme Court decree, because the water Illinois takes and sends down the Illinois River is water that leaves the Great Lakes for good. Suburbs beyond the pipes once relied on deep sandstone aquifers that dropped hundreds of feet over the twentieth century, and several have since switched to lake water or river water instead.

Groundwater is invisible, which makes it easy to overuse. You cannot see the water table fall the way you can watch a reservoir shrink. Managing it takes measurement: monitoring wells, records of pumping, and models of how the aquifer responds. Illinois’s state surveys have tracked the Mahomet and the sandstone aquifers for decades. Data, not guesswork, tells a town whether its water will still be there in fifty years.

Words to know
aquifer
an underground layer of sand, gravel or porous rock that holds enough water to pump
recharge
water soaking down from the surface to refill an aquifer
water table
the level underground below which the soil and rock are saturated with water
Check yourself

1. What happens when an aquifer is pumped faster than it is recharged?

2. Why is Illinois's use of Lake Michigan water limited by a court decree?

3. Why is groundwater especially easy to overuse compared with a reservoir?

48.3

Powering Illinois

Main ideaEvery energy source has costs and benefits; Illinois's mix of nuclear, gas, wind, solar and coal reflects a series of trade-offs.

Flip a switch in Illinois and the electricity most likely came from a nuclear plant. Illinois has more nuclear reactors than any other state, and they supply roughly half of the electricity generated here. A reactor splits uranium atoms to boil water and spin turbines. It releases no carbon dioxide while running, and one plant can power millions of homes. The trade-offs are real too: plants are expensive to build, the used fuel stays radioactive for thousands of years and still has no permanent national storage site, and accidents, though rare, can be severe.

Coal built the state’s grid in the twentieth century. It still supplies some power, but its share has fallen sharply. Burning coal releases more carbon dioxide per unit of electricity than any other common fuel. It also releases sulfur, mercury and fine particles that damage lungs. Natural gas burns cleaner and can ramp up quickly when demand spikes. But it still emits carbon dioxide, and leaks of methane, a strong greenhouse gas, add to its climate cost.

The prairie has become an energy field. Illinois ranks among the leading wind-power states, with rows of turbines across the flat farmland of the central counties, and solar farms are spreading. Wind and sun cost nothing as fuel and emit nothing in operation. Their weakness is timing: the wind drops and the sun sets, so a grid built on them needs storage, long transmission lines, or backup power. Turbines and panels also take land, though farming can continue between turbines.

No source wins on every count. Engineers and lawmakers compare them on cost, reliability, land use, water use, air pollution, greenhouse gases, waste and safety. A 2021 Illinois law set a schedule to phase out carbon emissions from the state’s power plants over the coming decades while supporting workers in coal towns. Whether that schedule is met depends on the same things this lesson lists: technology, price and choices.

Words to know
nuclear power
electricity made by using the heat from splitting uranium atoms to boil water and drive turbines
turbine
a set of blades spun by wind, water or steam to turn a generator
grid
the network of power plants, lines and transformers that delivers electricity
methane
the main gas in natural gas; a strong greenhouse gas when it leaks
Check yourself

1. What is the main advantage of nuclear power for the climate?

2. What is the main weakness of wind and solar power for a grid?

3. Why has coal's share of Illinois electricity fallen?

Section 2

Hazards and Risk

48.4

Hazard, Exposure and Risk

Main ideaRisk depends on the hazard, on who and what is in its path, and on how well they can withstand it; people can change the last two.

An earthquake in an empty desert is a hazard but not a disaster. The same earthquake under a city of unbraced brick buildings is a catastrophe. Scientists separate the pieces. A is the physical event: the shaking, the flood, the tornado, the heat. is who and what sits in its path. is how badly those people and structures would be hurt. is all three combined. People rarely control the hazard, but they can change exposure and vulnerability, and that is where most lives are saved.

Consider the New Madrid seismic zone. In the winter of 1811 to 1812 it produced some of the strongest earthquakes in the recorded history of the eastern United States. Few people lived there, so few died. Today the same zone lies near St. Louis, Memphis and southern Illinois, with millions of people, old brick buildings, bridges, pipelines and the Mississippi’s levees. The hazard is roughly what it was. The exposure has grown enormously. Building codes in the region now require quake-resistant design for new construction, which reduces vulnerability.

Measuring the hazard is the first step. Seismographs map where quakes cluster and how often. Stream gauges and rainfall records let hydrologists estimate the , the flood level with a 1 percent chance in any given year, a term many people misread as once a century. Doppler radar tracks the rotation inside storms. From these records come maps, and from maps come decisions: where to build, how to build, and what to insure.

Risk also carries values that science alone cannot settle. How safe is safe enough? Who pays to retrofit a school? A town may accept a small flood risk to keep a river view, or decide that a rare but terrible outcome is worth expensive protection. Science can say how likely and how bad. Communities decide what to do about it.

Words to know
natural hazard
a natural event that can cause harm, such as an earthquake, flood or tornado
exposure
the people, buildings and systems located where a hazard can reach them
vulnerability
how much harm a hazard would do to the people and structures it reaches
risk
the chance of harm, combining hazard, exposure and vulnerability
hundred-year flood
a flood level with a 1 percent chance of occurring in any single year
Check yourself

1. A magnitude 6 earthquake strikes an empty desert; an identical one strikes a city of brick buildings. What differs?

2. What does a hundred-year flood mean?

3. Why is the New Madrid zone a bigger risk today than in 1812, even though the hazard is about the same?

48.5

Too Much Water, Too Little

Main ideaFloods and droughts are natural, but levees, paving, drainage and land use change how much damage they do.

In the summer of 1993 rain fell on the upper Midwest for weeks. The Mississippi and Missouri rivers rose past every mark on their gauges. Levees, the earthen walls built to hold rivers in their channels, failed one after another. Water covered towns from Iowa to Missouri, closed the river to barges for weeks and flooded farmland across Illinois. It was among the most costly floods in United States history. The rain was extraordinary, but the damage was not only about rain.

A river naturally spreads onto its in high water, slowing and dropping sediment. keep the water in the channel, which protects the land behind them but pushes the water higher and faster downstream, toward the next town’s levee. Cities make it worse by paving. Rain that once soaked into prairie sod now races off roofs and parking lots into storm drains. Chicago answered its own flooding with the Deep Tunnel, begun in 1975: enormous tunnels and reservoirs carved in rock beneath the city to hold storm water until treatment plants can catch up.

Drought is the quieter hazard. In 2012 much of Illinois went weeks without meaningful rain during the hottest part of the growing season, and corn yields fell sharply. Drought does not knock down houses, but it drains reservoirs, stresses aquifers, kills crops and sets the stage for fire. On the Great Plains in the 1930s, drought plus bare soil made the Dust Bowl. The hazard was drought; the vulnerability was plowed land with nothing holding it.

The responses are a mix of engineering and restraint. Engineering: levees, reservoirs, tunnels, improved forecasts from the National Weather Service. Restraint: keeping buildings off floodplains, restoring wetlands that soak up water, planting cover crops that hold soil and moisture. After 1993, some Illinois and Missouri river towns took federal buyouts and moved to higher ground rather than rebuild in the same place. That is a choice to reduce exposure instead of fighting the hazard.

Words to know
floodplain
the flat land beside a river that naturally floods in high water
levee
a wall of earth or concrete built along a river to keep flood water out
drought
a long period with much less rain than usual
runoff
rain that flows over the surface instead of soaking into the ground
Check yourself

1. How does paving a city change the way rain behaves?

2. What is one downside of levees?

3. After 1993, some towns accepted buyouts and moved to higher ground. Which part of risk did that change?

48.6

Heat and Violent Storms

Main ideaWarnings, shelter and social connection decide whether heat waves and tornadoes become tragedies.

In July 1995 a dome of hot, humid air settled over Chicago for five days. Temperatures topped 40 degrees Celsius, and nights stayed hot enough that bodies never cooled. More than 700 people died, most of them elderly, poor and living alone in upper-floor apartments without air conditioning, some with windows nailed shut out of fear of crime. Heat is the deadliest weather hazard in the United States in many years, and it kills quietly, one person at a time.

The 1995 disaster showed that vulnerability is social as much as physical. Neighborhoods with the same heat had very different death tolls. Where people knew their neighbors and checked on them, more survived. Chicago now opens cooling centers, sends workers door to door during heat emergencies, and issues warnings days ahead. Cities are also hotter than the countryside because pavement and roofs absorb sunlight, an that adds several degrees on the worst days. Trees and reflective roofs cut it.

Illinois also sits in the path of the strongest thunderstorms on Earth. When warm, moist air from the Gulf of Mexico meets cold, dry air from the north, storms can rotate and spawn a . The deadliest tornado in United States history was the Tri-State Tornado of March 18, 1925. It ran for more than three hours across Missouri, Illinois and Indiana. It killed nearly 700 people, most of them in southern Illinois. There were no warnings at all; the word tornado was not even used in forecasts then.

Today Doppler radar can see rotation inside a storm before a funnel touches down, and the National Weather Service issues warnings that reach phones within seconds. Average warning time is now many minutes rather than zero. That does not stop the tornado. It changes vulnerability: time to reach a basement or an interior room. Building codes that anchor roofs and add safe rooms in schools do the same. The hazard has not shrunk since 1925; the death toll from a comparable storm would.

Words to know
heat wave
several days of unusually hot weather, often dangerous when nights stay hot
urban heat island
the extra warmth of a city caused by pavement and roofs absorbing sunlight
tornado
a violently rotating column of air reaching from a thunderstorm to the ground
Check yourself

1. Why did the 1995 Chicago heat wave kill so many people who lived alone?

2. What makes a city hotter than the surrounding farmland on the same day?

3. Doppler radar and phone alerts do not change the tornado itself. What do they change?

Section 3

How People Change Earth's Systems

48.7

From Prairie to Cornfield

Main ideaConverting nearly all of Illinois's prairie to farmland fed millions and also removed the deep roots that built and held the soil.

Two hundred years ago, tallgrass prairie covered more than half of Illinois, grasses taller than a person with roots reaching 3 meters down. Those roots built some of the richest soil on Earth, black and deep. Then the steel plow, invented by John Deere in Illinois in 1837, made it possible to cut the dense sod. Within a few decades the prairie was corn and wheat. Today less than one percent of the original prairie remains, in scattered patches along old railroad lines and in cemeteries.

The change was a huge human success by one measure. Illinois farmland now produces more corn and soybeans than almost any place on the planet and feeds people and livestock around the world. By another measure it opened a slow leak. Row crops leave soil bare for half the year. Rain and wind carry it off. Across the Corn Belt, topsoil has been lost at rates far faster than it forms, and in places the dark layer is noticeably thinner than it was a century ago.

is the same process that ate the Great Plains in the 1930s, only slower and wetter. It also carries fertilizer and soil into streams. The prairie had another job: its roots and the wetlands scattered across it held rain and released it slowly. Drained and tiled fields send water straight to ditches and rivers, adding to the flood peaks in the previous lesson. One change in land use touches soil, water and hazards at once.

Farmers and scientists have answers, many of them borrowed from the Soil Conservation Service. farming leaves last year’s stalks in place and plants through them, so the soil is never bare. such as rye grow through winter and hold the ground. Strips of restored prairie along field edges catch runoff. These practices cost money and time up front and pay back over years, which is the central tension of sustainability.

Words to know
tallgrass prairie
the grassland of tall grasses and wildflowers that once covered much of Illinois
erosion
the loss of soil as water or wind carries it away
no-till
farming that plants seeds through the previous crop's residue instead of plowing
cover crop
a crop such as rye grown between main crops to protect and hold the soil
Check yourself

1. What did prairie roots do that a cornfield does not?

2. How does no-till farming reduce erosion?

3. Why do many farmers hesitate to adopt cover crops even though they protect soil?

48.8

What Flows Downstream

Main ideaFertilizer and waste from Illinois travel down the Mississippi and starve the Gulf of Mexico of oxygen each summer.

Corn needs nitrogen. Farmers supply it as fertilizer, and much of what they apply washes off fields in spring rains or drains through the buried tile pipes that keep fields dry. From Illinois ditches it flows to the Illinois River, then the Mississippi, then the Gulf of Mexico. There, every summer, the extra feed a bloom of algae. The algae die, sink and decay, and decay uses up oxygen. A patch of bottom water thousands of square kilometers in size becomes too low in oxygen for fish and shrimp to live. Scientists call it the dead zone, or , and Illinois is one of its largest sources.

Nothing in the Gulf caused this. It is the sum of choices made in fields a thousand kilometers upstream, each one reasonable on its own. That is the signature of many environmental problems: the cost lands somewhere else, on someone else, later. Economists call this an . Measuring it is the first step: the size of the dead zone has been mapped every summer since the 1980s, and nutrient loads in the Mississippi are tracked by the U.S. Geological Survey.

Chicago has its own history of sending problems downstream. In the 1800s the city’s sewage flowed into the Chicago River and out into Lake Michigan, its drinking water, and typhoid and cholera killed thousands. In 1900 engineers finished a canal that reversed the river, sending waste south toward the Illinois River instead. It saved lives in Chicago and fouled the river for towns downstream for decades, until treatment plants and the 1972 Clean Water Act cleaned it up. The fish have since come back.

Solutions to nutrient pollution work at the source. Applying fertilizer in the right amount at the right time, based on soil tests, cuts loss and saves money. Cover crops take up leftover nitrogen. Restored wetlands and buffer strips filter drainage water before it reaches a ditch. Illinois has a Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy with numerical targets, and progress has been slow. The physics is clear; changing thousands of individual decisions is the hard part.

Words to know
nutrient
a substance living things need to grow, such as nitrogen or phosphorus
hypoxic zone
an area of water with so little oxygen that most animals cannot live there; also called a dead zone
externality
a cost of an action that falls on people who did not take the action
runoff
water that flows off land into streams, carrying soil and chemicals with it
Check yourself

1. What causes the Gulf of Mexico dead zone?

2. Why is the dead zone a good example of an externality?

3. Why did Chicago reverse its river in 1900?

48.9

The Air We Share

Main ideaPollution problems have been solved before when the science was clear and the substitutes existed; carbon dioxide is harder because it comes from nearly everything.

In 1985 scientists reported a hole in the over Antarctica. High in the atmosphere, ozone absorbs the sun’s ultraviolet light, which causes skin cancer and damages crops. The culprit was a family of chemicals called CFCs, used in spray cans, refrigerators and foam. Their danger had been predicted in 1974 from lab chemistry, then confirmed by measurements over the pole. Within two years the world’s nations signed the Montreal Protocol of 1987 to phase them out. Substitutes were available, and the ozone layer is now slowly healing.

Acid rain is another success. Sulfur from coal plants in the Midwest fell as acid across the Northeast, killing fish in lakes and weakening forests. The 1990 Clean Air Act amendments set a cap on sulfur emissions and let plants trade allowances, so cuts happened where they were cheapest. Sulfur emissions fell by far more than half at a fraction of the predicted cost, and many lakes have recovered. Chicago’s air, thick with coal smoke in the 1950s, is far cleaner today for the same reason.

Carbon dioxide is harder for three reasons. It comes from nearly every engine, furnace, power plant and factory on Earth, not one product or one industry. It lasts in the air for centuries, so past emissions keep acting. And its effects land on everyone, including people and nations that emitted little, which makes agreement difficult. The science is as clear as it was for ozone; the substitutes are spreading fast but are not yet everywhere.

The scale of the challenge tracks the scale of humanity. The world’s population reached 1 billion around 1800 and 8 billion in 2022, and energy use per person has grown even faster. Earth’s systems now respond to human choices at a planetary level. That is a new situation in the planet’s history, and it makes the next section’s question, how to weigh solutions, a question every citizen will face.

Words to know
ozone layer
a region of the upper atmosphere where ozone gas absorbs harmful ultraviolet light
CFC
chlorofluorocarbon, a chemical once used in sprays and refrigerators that destroys ozone
acid rain
rain made acidic by sulfur and nitrogen pollution from burning fuel
cap and trade
a rule that limits total pollution and lets companies buy and sell shares of the limit
Check yourself

1. Why did the Montreal Protocol succeed quickly?

2. How did the 1990 acid rain program cut sulfur cheaply?

3. Which reason makes carbon dioxide harder to control than CFCs?

Section 4

Weighing Solutions

48.10

Cost, Benefit and Constraint

Main ideaEngineers judge a solution by its benefits, its costs and the constraints it must satisfy, and no real solution wins on every count.

A coastal town faces rising seas and stronger storms. It could build a seawall, restore a marsh that absorbs waves, raise its buildings, or move back from the shore. Each choice protects something and gives something up. Choosing well takes a method, and the method is the same whether the problem is a seawall, a power plant or a school lunch program: name the , name the , estimate the costs and benefits of each option, and compare.

Criteria are what a good solution must do: keep people safe, keep costs down, keep the beach, keep the fishery. Constraints are hard limits: the budget, the law, the physics, the time. A seawall may score highest on safety but fail the budget and destroy the beach. Marsh restoration is cheaper and improves fishing but takes years to grow and cannot stop the biggest storms. A is what you accept losing on one criterion to gain on another.

Costs and benefits are rarely on the same scale. A seawall’s cost is in dollars; the lost beach is in summer afternoons and tourist jobs; safety is in lives. Some benefits come now and some in thirty years. Some costs fall on the town and some, like the marsh’s loss, fall on fish and on people not yet born. Honest analysis puts all of these on the table, says which are measured and which are estimated, and does not hide the ones that are hard to count.

Scientists supply the numbers: how high the water will get, how strong the wall must be, how fast a marsh grows. They do not get to decide whose beach matters more. That belongs to the people who live with the result. The best decisions come when the science is laid out clearly and the community, understanding it, chooses. That is why science literacy is a civic skill and not just a school subject.

Words to know
criteria
the goals a good solution must meet, used to compare options
constraint
a hard limit a solution cannot break, such as a budget, a law or the laws of physics
trade-off
giving up some of one thing you want to gain more of another
cost-benefit analysis
comparing what a choice costs against what it gains, including costs that are hard to count
Check yourself

1. Which of these is a constraint rather than a criterion?

2. What is a trade-off?

3. Why can scientists not settle by themselves whether a town should build a seawall?

48.11

Mitigation and Adaptation

Main ideaMitigation reduces the cause of a change; adaptation reduces its harm; a sensible plan does both.

Two words organize the response to climate change. means reducing the cause: emitting less greenhouse gas, or pulling it back out of the air. means preparing for the changes that are already coming: bigger storm drains, heat plans, drought-tolerant crops, moved homes. Mitigation is like fixing the leak; adaptation is like mopping the floor and moving the furniture. Since some warming is already locked in by past emissions, both are needed.

Mitigation options are known and the argument is about pace and cost. Replacing coal and gas plants with wind, solar, nuclear and storage cuts emissions at the source. Electric vehicles, better insulation and efficient motors cut the energy needed in the first place. Forests and soils can store carbon. Machines that capture carbon dioxide from smokestacks or the air exist but are costly and small so far. Each option has a price per ton avoided, and the cheapest ones, efficiency and wind, are already spreading on cost alone.

Adaptation in Illinois looks practical. The federal National Climate Assessment reports that the Midwest is seeing more heavy downpours, warmer winters, and more days of heat stress for crops and people. So Chicago is expanding the Deep Tunnel, planting trees against the heat island, and mapping which neighborhoods are most vulnerable. Farmers are shifting planting dates and drainage. Engineers now design culverts and sewers for the rainfall of the coming decades, not the records of the last century.

The two strategies interact. Every ton of mitigation reduces the adaptation the future will need; every dollar of adaptation buys time for mitigation to work. Doing only adaptation means running faster and faster to stay in place. Doing only mitigation ignores the flood already at the door. The evidence supports doing both, weighing each action with the criteria and constraints of the last lesson.

Words to know
mitigation
actions that reduce the cause of a problem, such as cutting greenhouse gas emissions
adaptation
actions that reduce the harm from a change that is already happening or expected
carbon capture
technology that removes carbon dioxide from smokestacks or the air and stores it
resilience
the ability of a community or system to absorb a shock and recover
Check yourself

1. Which is an example of adaptation?

2. Why are both mitigation and adaptation needed?

3. Which mitigation options are spreading fastest on cost alone?

48.12

Illinois in Fifty Years

Main ideaIllinois's food, water and energy futures are linked, and choices made in fields, cities and statehouses now will shape all three.

Picture central Illinois in 2075. What will be on the land? The safest answer is still corn and soybeans, but the details are open. Some fields may carry solar panels high enough to farm beneath, an approach called that is being tested in the state now. Wind turbines will likely be taller and fewer. Prairie strips and wetlands may thread between fields, holding soil and filtering water. Or the land may look much as it does now, with soil a little thinner and ditches a little browner. Both futures follow from choices.

Water ties it together. Wetter springs and hotter summers mean more runoff when fields are bare and more thirst when crops need water. Farmers who build soil with cover crops and no-till gain a sponge: soil rich in organic matter holds far more water per meter than depleted soil. That same practice keeps nitrogen out of the Gulf and stores carbon. One change addresses four problems, which is the mark of a strong solution.

Energy is the fastest-moving piece. Illinois already has a low-carbon backbone in its nuclear plants and a growing wind and solar fleet. The open questions are the ones engineers weigh with criteria and constraints: how much storage, how many transmission lines, whether to keep aging reactors running, how to help coal communities. Each answer is a trade-off among cost, reliability, land and jobs.

None of this is decided by nature. Earth’s systems set the constraints: the rain, the soil, the sun, the physics of carbon dioxide. Within them, the outcome is human. The Dust Bowl ended not because the wind quit but because people changed how they farmed, using evidence gathered by scientists and rules made by citizens. That is the whole lesson of this unit, compressed: understand the system, measure honestly, weigh the trade-offs, and choose.

Words to know
agrivoltaics
placing solar panels over farmland so crops or grazing continue beneath them
organic matter
decayed plant and animal material in soil that holds water and nutrients
transmission line
a high-voltage power line that carries electricity long distances from plants to cities
Check yourself

1. Why does soil rich in organic matter help with both drought and flooding?

2. What is agrivoltaics?

3. What ended the Dust Bowl's worst damage?

Chapter review

Human Sustainability

0 / 8

1. What made the Dust Bowl more than a natural disaster?

2. Which is a nonrenewable resource?

3. A town moves its houses off the floodplain. Which part of risk did it reduce?

4. What causes the dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico?

5. Why did the Montreal Protocol work faster than efforts to cut carbon dioxide?

6. Which statement about nuclear power in Illinois is accurate?

7. Building bigger storm sewers for heavier rains is an example of:

8. Which of these is a constraint in a decision about a levee?

Unit wrap-up

Earth and Space

Twelve words, twelve meanings

0 / 12

Tap a word, then tap its meaning. A right pair locks in green.

Words
Meanings
Unit test

Fifteen questions across the unit

0 / 15

1. How did astronomers learn that helium exists in the sun?

2. Why did Hubble's Cepheid in Andromeda settle the debate about what Andromeda was?

3. What happens to the light from a galaxy that is moving away from us?

4. Which evidence for the Big Bang was predicted before it was observed?

5. A rock holds one eighth of its original uranium-238, whose half-life is about 4.5 billion years. What can you say about its age?

6. What was the main reason geologists rejected Wegener's continental drift in the 1920s?

7. Where is the oldest ocean floor found?

8. Which observation shows that Earth's outer core is liquid?

9. What did John Tyndall demonstrate in 1859?

10. Melting sea ice exposes dark water that absorbs more sunlight, which melts more ice. This is:

11. How do scientists know the carbon dioxide level of the air 500,000 years ago?

12. What made the basins of the Great Lakes?

13. Why was the Dust Bowl worse than a drought alone would have been?

14. Two towns face the same flood. One kept its floodplain as parkland; the other built houses on it. Which part of risk differs?

15. A city plans bigger storm sewers for heavier future rains and also replaces a coal plant with wind turbines. Which is which?

Spiral review

Five questions from earlier units

0 / 5

1. (Unit 20) Which type of electromagnetic wave has the most energy per photon?

2. (Unit 19) An atom has 8 protons, 10 neutrons and 8 electrons. Which is true?

3. (Unit 18) Why must sunlight keep arriving for an ecosystem to continue, while carbon does not need to be added from outside?

4. (Unit 17) In a pedigree, two unshaded parents have a shaded child. The trait is:

5. (Unit 16) What did van Helmont's willow tree experiment show?

Write it

Make a claim about whether Illinois farmers should be required to plant cover crops on fields left bare over winter. Support it with evidence from this unit on soil, water, nutrients and climate, and address the strongest argument against your position.

  • State your claim in one clear sentence: required, encouraged with payments, or left to each farmer.
  • Use specific evidence: the Dust Bowl, erosion rates versus soil formation, the Gulf dead zone, runoff and flooding, carbon storage in soil.
  • Explain the reasoning that links each piece of evidence to your claim; do not just list facts.
  • Weigh the trade-offs honestly: cost and effort now versus benefits later, and who pays and who gains.
  • Address the other side: what would a farmer who opposes a requirement say, and how does your evidence answer it?
0 wordsSaved on this device as you type.

Practice rooms

Rooms already on the site that belong to this unit — cards, quizzes, a lab.

For the teacher

Every lesson keeps its own three checks; a lesson is ticked when all three are right. Chapter reviews, the unit test and its spiral review (five questions from earlier units in this band) score on the page. When the site is connected to your sheet, or the link carries ?dest=, each one also has a Send box: the first-try score, the standards, the supports used, the attempt number and the minutes go to your sheet as an IEP data point.

Print this page for a paper copy of the readings, the sources, the words and the questions; the answers print as dashed boxes under each question.

Fact-check notes for this course live in the handoff: quotes marked (paraphrased) were set that way on purpose.